Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
От | Richard Guo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMbWs48fpP=OU5VLOGBBgvA4kxnPXTCVJh3Qayo1i-K=3Pt4Nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop() (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote: > Please look at a recent buildfarm failure [1], which shows some > instability of that test addition: > -- the joinrel is not parallel-safe due to the OFFSET clause in the subquery > explain (costs off) > select * from tenk1 t1, (select * from tenk2 t2 offset 0) t2 where t1.two > t2.two; > - QUERY PLAN > -------------------------------------------- > + QUERY PLAN > +------------------------------------------------- > Nested Loop > Join Filter: (t1.two > t2.two) > - -> Gather > - Workers Planned: 4 > - -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 t1 > + -> Seq Scan on tenk2 t2 > -> Materialize > - -> Seq Scan on tenk2 t2 > + -> Gather > + Workers Planned: 4 > + -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 t1 > (7 rows) Thank you for the report and investigation. Will have a look. Thanks Richard
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: