Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash

Thank you for your work on the subject.

During review your patch I didn't understand why are you checking that the variable is path and not new_path of type T_SamplePath (I highlighted it)?

Is it a typo and should be new_path?

Besides, it may not be important, but reviewing your code all the time stumbled on the statement of the comments while reading it (I highlighted it too). This:

* path_is_reparameterizable_by_child
 *         Given a path parameterized by the parent of the given child relation,
 *         see if it can be translated to be parameterized by the child relation.
 *
 * This must return true if and only if reparameterize_path_by_child()
 * would succeed on this path.

Maybe is it better to rewrite it simplier:

 * This must return true only if reparameterize_path_by_child()
 * would succeed on this path.

And can we add assert in reparameterize_pathlist_by_child function that pathlist is not a NIL, because according to the comment it needs to be added there:

Hmm, I'm not sure, as in REPARAMETERIZE_CHILD_PATH_LIST we have already
explicitly checked that the pathlist is not NIL.

Thanks