Re: BUG: deadlock between autovacuum worker and client backend during removal of orphan temp tables with sequences
От | Akshat Jaimini |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG: deadlock between autovacuum worker and client backend during removal of orphan temp tables with sequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMaW3Vic0XmEvLz=Rv-_ODQfxOz3OsitjxahGxH5Nif32P0REA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG: deadlock between autovacuum worker and client backend during removal of orphan temp tables with sequences (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi apologies for the late reply.
> Maybe you forgot to recompile/reinstall after updating past that commit?
I did recompile it earlier but just to be sure I followed the steps again and now its working!
Regards,
Akshat Jaimini
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 12:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Akshat Jaimini <destrex271@gmail.com> writes:
> The code seems to implement the feature and has good and explanatory comments associated with it.
> I believe we can go ahead with committing patch although I would request some senior contributors to also take a look at this patch since I am relatively new to patch reviews.
Looks like a good catch and a reasonable fix. Pushed after rewriting
the comments a bit.
As far as this goes:
> I ran make installcheck-world after applying the patch and recompiling it. It did fail for a particular test but from the logs it seems to be unrelated to this particular patch since it fails for the following:
> ==========================
> select error_trap_test();
> - error_trap_test
> ----------------------------
> - division_by_zero detected
> -(1 row)
> -
> +ERROR: cannot start subtransactions during a parallel operation
... that's the test case from 0075d7894, and the failure is what
I'd expect from a backend older than that. Maybe you forgot to
recompile/reinstall after updating past that commit?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: