Re: PHJ file leak.
От | Jeremy Finzel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PHJ file leak. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMa1XUjx3=AYEvAzDuOdxdw8YgfTapxTqTdsA9AcYYJ9jA3Fpg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PHJ file leak. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 9:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com> writes:
> We are hitting this leak in production on an 11.6 system for a query that
> is using a parallel hash join. Was this fix pushed in 11.7? I can't tell
> clearly from the release notes for 11.7 or this thread.
It looks like you're asking about this commit:
Author: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Branch: master [76cbfcdf3] 2019-11-16 10:11:30 +1300
Branch: REL_12_STABLE Release: REL_12_2 [24897e1a1] 2019-11-16 10:18:45 +1300
Branch: REL_11_STABLE Release: REL_11_7 [bc049d0d4] 2019-11-16 10:19:16 +1300
Always call ExecShutdownNode() if appropriate.
which is documented thus in the 11.7 release notes:
<listitem>
<!--
Author: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Branch: master [76cbfcdf3] 2019-11-16 10:11:30 +1300
Branch: REL_12_STABLE [24897e1a1] 2019-11-16 10:18:45 +1300
Branch: REL_11_STABLE [bc049d0d4] 2019-11-16 10:19:16 +1300
-->
<para>
Ensure parallel plans are always shut down at the correct time
(Kyotaro Horiguchi)
</para>
<para>
This oversight is known to result in <quote>temporary file
leak</quote> warnings from multi-batch parallel hash joins.
</para>
</listitem>
regards, tom lane
Thank you! Yep, pretty clear :).
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: