Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae
От | Bowen Shi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM_vCuc=S=djaSyVUQDDJ7fmxQqVr4dB-iv2mdNMSWA=GRb6Dg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:42 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 11:19 PM Bowen Shi <zxwsbg12138@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Obviously we should actually fix this on back branches, but could we
>> at least make the retry loop interruptible in some way so people could
>> use pg_cancel/terminate_backend() on a stuck autovacuum worker or
>> vacuum process?
>
>
> If the problem happens in versions <= PG 16, we don't have a good solution (vacuum process holds the exclusive lock cause checkpoint hangs).
>
> Maybe we can make the retry loop interruptible first. However, since we are using START_CRIT_SECTION, we cannot simply use CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS to handle it.
As far as I can tell, in 14 and 15, the versions where the issue
reported here is present, there is not a critical section in the
section of code looped through in the retry loop in lazy_scan_prune().
We can actually fix the particular issue I reproduced with the
attached patch. However, I think it is still worth making the retry
loop interruptible in case there are other ways to end up infinitely
looping in the retry loop in lazy_scan_prune().
Regards
Bowen Shi
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: