Module extension for parsing and rewriting functions with infixed syntax
От | Thomas Girault |
---|---|
Тема | Module extension for parsing and rewriting functions with infixed syntax |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMVHftThKuP4u6qLSuUJ8DC1Z+8gtZ052EmBf+1gkA+R6KaaGw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Module extension for parsing and rewriting functions with infixed syntax
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, I am working on a PostgreSQL extension module which defines new grammar rules completing the classical SQL syntax defined in the src/backend/parser/gram.y file. Basically, I want to handle predicates having an infixed syntax { X IS Y } and rewrite them as classical Boolean functions with prefixed syntax { Y(X) }. For instance, the following query :SELECT * FROM cars WHERE cars.color IS yellow; would be rewritten into :SELECT * FROM cars WHERE yellow(cars.color); The new predicate could be rewritten as a plpgsql Boolean function with an unique argument (cars.color IS yellow --> yellow(cars.color)). I have then added the following rule to the "func_expr" definition (see gram.y:10280 in postgresql-9.1beta3 source code) : func_expr: ...| func_arg_expr IS func_name over_clause { FuncCall *n = makeNode(FuncCall); n->funcname = $3; n->args = list_make1($1); n->agg_order = NIL; n->agg_star = FALSE; n->agg_distinct = FALSE; n->func_variadic = FALSE; n->over = $4; n->location = @1; $$ = (Node *)n; } ... However, my first attempt leads to the following errors :/usr/bin/bison -d -o gram.c gram.ygram.y: conflicts: 84 shift/reduce,807 reduce/reducegram.y: expected 0 shift/reduce conflictsgram.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts How can I avoid this kind of errors without changing the entire grammar? In addition, I would rather making this new functionality independent of the original PostgreSQL source code. Ideally, the new defined bison rules would be defined in an autonomous module extension. I have seen that some contrib modules (such as SEG or CUBE) define separate bison grammar rules. However, I don't understand yet how such rules integrate with the gram.y file without any conflicts. Can I define my new bison rules separately of the gram.y file? Can I use the new functionality dynamically after loading an extension module (LOAD 'MY_EXTENSION';)? I am new in the PostgreSQL community and any ideas for solving these problems would be very helpful. Thanks by advance, Thomas Girault
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: