Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMT0RQSVMhk3FVDED8GxrKM35dj3z3Zx6TrSV4cZRTrof3xxdg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I discovered this thread from a Twitter post "PostgreSQL will finally be rewritten in Rust" :) On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 5:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: > > I spoke with some folks at PGCon about making PostgreSQL multi-threaded, > > so that the whole server runs in a single process, with multiple > > threads. It has been discussed many times in the past, last thread on > > pgsql-hackers was back in 2017 when Konstantin made some experiments [0]. > > > I feel that there is now pretty strong consensus that it would be a good > > thing, more so than before. Lots of work to get there, and lots of > > details to be hashed out, but no objections to the idea at a high level. > > > The purpose of this email is to make that silent consensus explicit. If > > you have objections to switching from the current multi-process > > architecture to a single-process, multi-threaded architecture, please > > speak up. > > For the record, I think this will be a disaster. There is far too much > code that will get broken, largely silently, and much of it is not > under our control. > > regards, tom lane > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: