Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMT0RQR0Op5uSgunWpcTRjge5sjXL1nGY=xLG8PxFn4Smy4gcw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
How are you envisioning the shared-memory signaling should work in the original sample case, where the archiver had been failing for half a year ? Or should we perhaps have a system table for ready-to-archive WAL files to get around limitation sof file system to return just the needed files with ORDER BY ... LIMIT as we already know how to make lookups in database fast ? Cheers Hannu On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:24 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:23 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > FWIW It's already done for v14 individually. > > > > Author: Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org> > > Date: Mon Mar 15 13:13:14 2021 +0900 > > > > Make archiver process an auxiliary process. > > Oh, I hadn't noticed. Thanks. > > -- > Robert Haas > EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: