Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
От | Mike Palmiotto |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMN686G+DAJJFt1WN=uwrN4F5TpwqKjuJa_61TArqHR=L=4PJw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:49 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > 0002 seems way too large (and it doesn't currently apply). Is there > something we can do to make it more manageable? Initially we were thinking of submitting one patch for the centralization work and then separate patches per backend type. We opted not to go that route, mainly because of the number of resulting patches (there were somewhere around 13 total, as I remember). If it makes sense, we can go ahead and split the patches up in that fashion after rebasing. > > I think it would be better to put your 0001 in second place rather than > first, since your other patch doesn't use it AFAICS and it adds > functionality that has not yet received approval [or even been > discussed], while the other is necessary refactoring. Sounds good. -- Mike Palmiotto https://crunchydata.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: