Re: postgresql13-llvm jit-13.5-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64
От | Rick Otten |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql13-llvm jit-13.5-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMAYy4JF+8=dWmmZAubKvJE9f9oMAYKPd9rOVUwhWDn2uvFM0w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql13-llvm jit-13.5-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 (Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:57 AM Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/15/21 00:04, Pavel Stehule wrote:Hi
There is a CentOS8-stream version which solves the problem but I cannot
use that in the office. I will probably have to wait for another month
before OL8 has everything that I need in its repositories. Now, the
question is what kind of an impact will running without llvm-jit have?
According to the links below, llvm-jit effects are quite spectacular:
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2016-09/slides/Melnik-PostgreSQLLLVM.pdf
https://www.pgcon.org/2017/schedule/events/1092.en.htmlWhen JIT was used on very large query with a lot of CASE expr, then JIT has a positive effect about 50%. On usual large queries, the effect of JIT was about 20%. Unfortunately, JIT is sensitive to estimation, and the JIT sometimes increases seconds to queries, although without JIT this query is executed in ms. When you use a query that can be well calculated in parallel, then positive effect of JIT is less.RegardsPavelThanks Pavel, you answered my question. I'll wait with the upgrade.
FWIW, there was a lively discussion on the postgresql subreddit over the weekend on JIT: https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/qtsif5/cascade_of_doom_jit_and_how_a_postgres_update_led/
(lively for that subreddit anyway)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: