Re: [pgAdmin][RM5017] Use cheroot as default production server
| От | Aditya Toshniwal |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgAdmin][RM5017] Use cheroot as default production server |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAM9w-_ny_icvP7SCqAQ9CdeOnRWaAeeX4esSYkP2dHCQcjtXNA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [pgAdmin][RM5017] Use cheroot as default production server (Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [pgAdmin][RM5017] Use cheroot as default production server
|
| Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Ashesh,
I had tried with - https://newrelic.com/ API to check Flask app performance. To be honest, there was not a great difference in the performance.
Per new relic, cheroot used slightly less CPU, with more RPM and, with less response time.
Anyway, flask is still not recommended and cheroot looks a good option as it is pure python and supports almost all OS.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Have you seen any improvements in performance?On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, 15:16 Aditya Toshniwal, <aditya.toshniwal@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi Hackers,Attached is the patch to use https://pypi.org/project/cheroot/ instead of current flask dev server. cheroot is a stable production ready server. Plus, flask dev server is not recommended for production.Code is changed to use cheroot only when DEBUG is False, otherwise you the default flask server.--Kindly review.Thanks and Regards,Aditya ToshniwalSr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune"Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Toshniwal
pgAdmin Hacker | Sr. Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB India | Pune
"Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a TREE"
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: