Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged"
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZTnStjOJpCZFskOAQ5oeBPd78znx0qk_QC4wXahJf_aCA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged" (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged"
Re: GSoC proposal - "make an unlogged table logged" |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote: > Is the TODO item "make an unlogged table logged" [1] a good GSoC project? Another interesting project around unlogged tables would be to make it possible to have unlogged indexes on fully-logged tables. That is something that there was some discussion of before, that might be easier. FWIW, I don't think that TODO page is a very good resource for finding a starter project. Picking a good project is a skill in and of itself. A lot of that stuff is aspirational, either because it's difficult, or, more often, because it's difficult relative to the rewards, which can be quite low. To be honest, if I have what I imagine to be a great idea for a project, I don't put it on that page. Maybe I should, but I don't, and I don't think that is uncommon. This is not because I'm particularly guarded about sharing the information. Why do you think that hash indexes still aren't WAL-logged after all these years (a project that someone made noise about recently in relation to GSoC), even though that's generally considered to be a SMOP? -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: