Re: Per row status during INSERT .. ON CONFLICT UPDATE?
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Per row status during INSERT .. ON CONFLICT UPDATE? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZTKnDgLc9FYTLR+LwJtoJ5F6_GqvWB5EyrbZM_Jm8XwZw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Per row status during INSERT .. ON CONFLICT UPDATE? (Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Per row status during INSERT .. ON CONFLICT UPDATE?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com> wrote: > My use-case is to create an extra row for all UPDATEd rows (only), which is > implemented in MSSQL by enveloping the MERGE with an INSERT (MERGE ... > OUTPUT $action) WHERE $action = 'UPDATE'. That could make sense. You can achieve something similar with per-row triggers, perhaps. > Am still to test, but looks like Thom's reply earlier could take care of my > use-case, so we may need more people requesting this magic field, with a > valid use-case. I'm not opposed to it, but it's not a personal priority to implement this. I don't think it's great practice to use the hidden fields like that. I can't see anything other than a dedicated expression serving this purpose, if there is ever a documented solution. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: