Re: Schedule for 9.5alpha1
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schedule for 9.5alpha1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZT7td6JyzNtJze2-yCcJD+4coaH7RD8zHdLw6=aXt5Rsg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Schedule for 9.5alpha1 (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Schedule for 9.5alpha1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm tired of having to chase down known bugs when a patch has been >> around for a long time, and an actual fix is blocking on committer >> availability -- sometimes I feel the need to privately twist someone's >> arm just to get something done that should be straightforward. > > Patience is the key here IMO, committer time being precious. And I > guess that the requirement for the .0 release will be to clear all > those items btw, so they will be fixed at some point. Some more transparency in both directions, and the ability to triage bugs would be nice. Sometimes things aren't that complicated, but are still important (while other times, things can be complicated and unimportant). I have no good way of making a representation about which category any given bug fix falls under. Also, while the commitfest app makes it pretty likely that someone will get around to considering a bug fix eventually, the time that that takes is completely unbounded. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: