Re: BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZT7YYjf=SR-Vc6GCe6g1zHrUjKaA=5UwLymO3goWxPR+w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm in favor of just adding a debug option. We should introduce a more >> general idea of a #define that enables a variety of debugging options, >> because it's silly to have to worry about buildfarm coverage each and >> every time this crops up. I'm not entirely sure what level that should >> be scoped at. The status quo is impractical. > > I don't exactly see how that leads to any improvement --- you still end > up having to manually configure some buildfarm critters for coverage, no? Yes, but you only have to do it once. I don't see the problem with creating a #define that represents a grab-bag of debug options that should run on one or two buildfarm animals. That doesn't preclude also allowing things like RAW_EXPRESSION_COVERAGE_TEST to be enabled more selectively. In short, I want to make it easier to add custom debugging options that could trip a regression test failure. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: