Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZT04ZOVdh5j6kA4hX3kg3XLir28jsvrqT2Cxhv1QDy9kQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> If that is the case, I'd argue that's a glibc problem, not our
> problem.  Of course, we could provide an option to disable abbreviated
> keys for the benefit of people who need to work around buggy libc
> implementations.

That would be an easy patch to write. We'd simply have a test within
bttextsortsupport() that had systems that disabled abbreviated keys
for text PG_RETURN_VOID(). Actually, to be more precise we'd put that
next to the Windows code within varstr_sortsupport() (the function is
called btsortsupport_worker in 9.5). It would look at a GUC, I
suppose.

--
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)