Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSbJNraCkPNsv_Uh69Ja+DK7xP11DHZEf3RjLgJ12K1KA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> We *do* have regression test coverage, but that code is set up to not
> kick in at any index scale that would be sane to test in the regression
> tests.  See
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12194.1466724741@sss.pgh.pa.us

I'm well aware of that issue. This is the same reason why we don't
have any regression test coverage of external sorts. I don't think
that that's good enough.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tuplesort.c's copytup_index() is dead code
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)