Re: Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only)

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the interest of clarity, I was not intending to say that there
> should be a regression test in the patch.  I was intending to say that
> there should be a test case with the bug report.  I'm not opposed to
> adding a regression test, and I like the idea of attempting to do so
> while requiring only a relatively small amount of data by changing
> maintenance_work_mem, but that wasn't the target at which I was
> aiming.  Nevertheless, carry on.

How do you feel about adding testing to tuplesort.c not limited to
hitting this bug (when Valgrind memcheck is used)?

Are you satisfied that I have adequately described steps to reproduce?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan