Re: Test code is worth the space
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Test code is worth the space |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZS9WwnnxeaTimQqmRqE28an9oKOP2sZkhKiZc7pdhUL4Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Test code is worth the space (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Test code is worth the space
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> The value of a core regression suite that takes less time to run has >> to be weighed against the possibility that a better core regression >> suite might cause us to find more bugs before committing. That could >> easily be worth the price in runtime. > > > Or have a quickcheck you run "all the time" and then run the bigger one once > before committing perhaps? I favor splitting the regression tests to add "all the time" and "before commit" targets as you describe. I think that once the facility is there, we can determine over time how expansive that second category gets to be. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: