Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements
| От | Peter Geoghegan | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAM3SWZS2ysuMRJduTtBJkDOm8u3MAOgksLFn=2UgC8T-QJc7vw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: >> To be clear: I wasn't sure why you though I falsely count entries with >> dropped texts within entry_dealloc(). > > In the existing^H^H^Hprevious code, dropped-text entries would essentially > act as length-zero summands in the average calculation, whereas I think > we agree that they ought to be ignored; otherwise they decrease the > computed mean and thereby increase the probability of (useless) GC cycles. > In the worst case where the hashtable is mostly dropped-text entries, > which would for instance be the prevailing situation shortly after a GC > failure, we'd be calculating ridiculously small mean values and that'd > prompt extra GC cycles no? Yes, but my patch changed that, too. I suggested that first. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: