Re: Releasing in September
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Releasing in September |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZRwVr+oq67wdEJthRp85h0bFbTFAjxWSJOG6MHd2AT10g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Releasing in September (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Releasing in September
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps some people are more interested in implementing new > features than working on bugs and would just continue hacking and > arguing about new features, at least a stability period may attract > more committer attention into actual bug fixes, in short: no new > features can be committed until the previous versions has reached at > least beta2, rc, whatever. This may accelerate the stability process. Or it might just accelerate the amount of time it takes to *declare* having reached that milestone. Besides, do you really think that people need to be able to commit something before seriously working on it? Rules that are expressly coercive are a *bad* idea. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: