Re: parallel workers and client encoding

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is no realistic way that I am going to have this fixed before
> beta2.  There are currently 10 open items listed on the open items
> page, of which 8 relate to my commits and 5 to parallel query in
> particular.  I am not going to get 8 issues fixed in the next 4 days,
> or even the next 6 days if you assume I can work through the weekend
> on this (and that it would be desirable that I be slinging fixes into
> the tree just before the wrap, which seems doubtful).  Furthermore, of
> those issues, I judge this to be least important (except for the
> documentation update, but that's pending further from Peter Geoghegan
> about exactly what he thinks needs to be changed).

I got sidetracked on that, in part due to investigating a bug in the
9.6 external sort work. I'll have more information on that, soon.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan