Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZRnZmzQvKkBZZnRO=ecigG3dkO+uwZ-a-NNLF0yPR0QFg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition (Christian Kruse <christian@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Christian Kruse <christian@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Ok, benchmark for baseline+alignment patch is running. I see that you have enabled latency information. For this kind of thing I prefer to hack pgbench-tools to not collect this (i.e. to not pass the "-l" flag, "Per-Transaction Logging"). Just remove it and pgbench-tools rolls with it. It may well be that the overhead added is completely insignificant, but for something like this, where the latency information is unlikely to add any value, I prefer to not take the chance. This is a fairly minor point, however, especially since these are only 60 second runs where you're unlikely to accumulate enough transaction latency information to notice any effect. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: