Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I think having a public git tree, that contains the current state, is
> greatly helpful for that. Just announce that you're going to screw
> wildly with history, and that you're not going to be terribly careful
> about commit messages.  That means observers can just do a fetch and a
> reset --hard to see the absolutely latest and greatest.  By all means
> post a series to the list every now and then, but I think for minor
> changes it's perfectly sane to say 'pull to see the fixups for the
> issues you noticed'.

I would really like for there to be a way to do that more often. It
would be a significant time saver, because it removes problems with
minor bitrot.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan