Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in 9.3.2?
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in 9.3.2? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZQwLTqM3_uMomUtw3oHXKOoeHDOgwX969vetHXiiv02mQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in 9.3.2? (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is anyone aware of data loss causing MultiXact bugs in
9.3.2?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Was there an index only scan or just a index scan? Any chance of a > corrupted index? Just an index scan. I think it's unlikely to be a corrupt index, because the customer said that he dropped and restored the index, and it's difficult to imagine how VACUUM FREEZE could then have impacted a plan with only a sequential scan. > Do you still have the page from before you did the VACUUM? It seems likely that I could get it, given that the problem persisted over several days (apparently there was an earlier, manual attempt to repair the damage by hand). I'm reasonably confident that I could get back an affected database by performing a point-in-time recovery. That would also give me the benefit of an environment that I could break as needed. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: