Re: Remove autovacuum GUC?
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove autovacuum GUC? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZQDAjCizfpxEMtZmJB6wODd90WpSxvhSSV1RQvGLPDVkg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove autovacuum GUC? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove autovacuum GUC?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> The right answer isn't the answer founded in the reality for many if not >> most of our users. > > I think that's high-handed nonsense. Sure, there are some > unsophisticated users who do incredibly stupid things and pay the > price for it, but there are many users who are very sophisticated and > make good decisions and don't want or need the system itself to act as > a nanny. When we constrain the range of possible choices because > somebody might do the wrong thing, sophisticated users are hurt > because they can no longer make meaningful choices, and stupid users > still get in trouble because that's what being stupid does. The only > way to fix that is to help people be less stupid. You can't tell > adult users running enterprise-grade software "I'm sorry, Dave, I > can't do that". Or at least it can cause a few problems. +1 I really don't like this paternalistic mindset. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: