Re: remaining open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: remaining open items
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQ8sf838VSce0qqXZmyc7eyafXuyCc=3n2dzoRqb40FOw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: remaining open items  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: remaining open items  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all?
>
> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile
> goal, but certainly not a release blocker.

While I agree with this assessment, I think that there is value in
doing it before release, to ease keeping the branches in sync. That
seems like the better time to backpatch to 9.5. That was the thinking
behind putting it on the open items list.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Have dtrace depend on object files directly, not objfiles.txt