Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZQ-znY56vJDkN2Vk3TKeDaovavPx2UAt65UuX+U32A4rg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-04-17 13:33:27 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> Just over 99.6% of pages (leaving aside the meta page) in the big 10 >> GB pgbench_accounts_pkey index are leaf pages. > > That's a rather nice number. I knew it was big, but I'd have guessed > it'd be a percent lower. Yes, it's usually past 99.5% for int4. It's really bad if it's as low as 96%, and I think that often points to what are arguably bad indexing choices, like indexing text columns that have long text strings. > Do you happen to have the same stat handy for a sensibly wide text or > numeric real world index? It'd be interesting to see what the worst case > there is. Yes, as it happens I do: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZTcXrdDZSpA11qZXiyo4_jtxwjaNdZpnY54yjzq7d64=A@mail.gmail.com I was working of my Mouse Genome database, which is actually real-world data use by medical researchers, stored in a PostgreSQL database by those researchers and made available for the benefit of other medical researchers. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: