Re: Back branches vs. gcc 4.8.0

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The respective macro magic is already in place, its just not used in all
> places. The problem is more that we can't easily use it in all places
> because e.g. in the one case mentioned here the array isn't in the last
> place *in the back branches*.

Are you proposing that we use the FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER macro in every
single place where we currently use the one element array pattern? I
count one place where we currently use FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER. It'd be
pretty ugly to have that everywhere, in my opinion.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan