Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HPteZ-4DGjTycQ8GGsG-WA99M0ZiaOHFqHJF19-U7gE4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Isn't that lock held while doing visibility checks? > > Nope. heap_update() and friends do a very complicated little dance to > avoid that. ... >> What about I/O >> waiting for a clog page to be read? > > I'm pretty sure that can happen I'm confused because i thought these two sentences were part of describing the same case. > because TransactionIdIsCommitted() > can get called from HeapTupleSatisfies*() which pretty much only gets > called while holding the page lock. I don't know whether it's the > cause of these particular stalls, but it's plausible if the CLOG cache > is getting thrashed hard enough. I wonder if it would make sense to, if we come across an xid that isn't in the slru release the lock while we read in the clog page. When we reobtain it we can check if the LSN has changed and if it has restart the visibility checks. If it hasn't pick up where we left off. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: