Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux)
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HOheMMcDOJUCZn32YwKEux_VJYjPKjVXufLWnGkrWon_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux) (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fixing Google Search on the docs (redux)
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> all other URLs will be considered duplicate URLs and crawled less often What Google crawls and what Google considers a valid search result to serve users are two independent questions. Google may well crawl the non-canonical results but never serve them. The crawl would still, for example, add weight to pages linked from it. It's always really hard to tell when reading Google docs whether they're talking about crawl behaviour or search results behaviour. > - Where a page has been removed entirely, mark the most recent version of it as the canonical one instead of the /current/version). This seems like a significant advance on previous ideas. If we have enough meta data available to do this that would be a big win. I think it's rare that we remove information from a page but keep the same page. Generally things like recovery.conf would mean removing whole pages replacing them with new pages that document new functionality.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: