Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again
| От | Greg Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAM-w4HOcxOpFyAmVxHW3h6_7=63B_cXd5E=g+WpCCPoT3OWRCw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again
Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I think that was spurious. It looked good when we looked at it yesterday. The rest that failed seemed unrelated and was also taking on my SSL patch too.
I talked to Andres about the possibility of torn reads in the pg_class stats but those are all 4-byte columns so probably safe. And in any case that's a pre-existing possibility just more likely (if it's possible at all) by frequent truncates.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023, 15:47 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2022-Dec-13, Greg Stark wrote:
> So here I've done it that way. It is a bit of an unfortunate layering
> since it means the heapam_handler is doing the catalog change but it
> does seem inconvenient to pass relfrozenxid etc back up and have the
> caller make the changes when there are no other changes to make.
Are you still at this? CFbot says the meson tests failed last time for
some reason:
http://commitfest.cputube.org/greg-stark.html
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: