Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HOU+ua=uR1cRZp5eNgJXT_g8NZe7121LMxU774ey0_PPQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> fsync=off synchronous_commits=off replaced fsync=off in almost every use case where fsync=off might have been useful. The only remaining use case is for the initial build of a database. In that case what the user really wants is to turn off WAL logging entirely though. Having a WAL log and not fsyncing it is kind of pointless. I guess it lets you replicate the database but it doesn't let you use the WAL log for recovery locally. > Bloat > ------ > > Table bloat. Table bloat has been a major issue with PostgreSQL users/admins > for years. Anyone care to explain to me in a simple paragraph how to find > out if you have table or index bloat issues in your database and what to do > about it? (Maybe we need "pg_catalog.pg_index_bloat" and > "pg_catalog.pg_table_bloat" views including FILLFACTOR correction?) A nice view that exposes a summary of information from the fsm per table would be pretty handy. In general there's a lot of data tied up in things like the fsm that could be usefully exposed to users. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: