Re: Commitfest Closed
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commitfest Closed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HNxvi210GHO35uuUFF2_AXSPeGjCKnLWT3Cy4KoWeFQAg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Commitfest Closed (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I moved to next CF almost all the Needs Review and Waiting on Author patches. The remaining ones are either: 1) Bug fixes, Documentation, or testing patches that we may want to make Open Issues 2) Patches that look like we may want to mark Rejected or Returned with Feedback and start a new discussion 3) Patches whose email history confused me, such as where multiple patches are under discussion I also haven't gone through the Ready for Committer patches yet. I'll do that at the end of the day. Incidentally I marked a lot of the Waiting on Author patches as Needs Review before moving to the next CF because generally I think they were only Waiting on Author because of the cfbot failures and they were waiting on design feedback. Also, as another aside, I find a lot of the patches that haven't been reviewed were patches that were posted without any specific concerns or questions. That tends to imply the author thinks the patch is ready and just waiting on a comprehensive review which is a daunting task. I would suggest if you're an author posting a WIP and there's some specific uncertainties that you have about the patch that asking about them would encourage reviewers to dive in and help you make progress.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: