Re: Truncate if exists
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Truncate if exists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HNfEpP5fMvx8Stinmh_KaZC0QKMG4OXz6XYqt=Wuw2-1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Truncate if exists (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Truncate if exists
Re: Truncate if exists |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > To be perfectly frank, I think that's exactly where we ought to be > going. Oracle and Microsoft both did it, so why are we convinced it's > a bad idea? One of the huge problems with PL/pgsql is that every SQL > expression in there has to be passed to the executor separately, which > is painfully slow. I'm a bit lost. I would think pl/pgsql is precisely the same as Oracle's pl/sql and MS's T-SQL. I see the complaint you have as a purely implementation detail. I don't think pl/pgsql is the best implemented part of Postgres but I don't see how integrating it into the core is going to automatically make it all wonderful either. Fwiw my experience has consistently been that life got better whenever I moved anything I had implemented as PL/SQL or PL/pgsql into client code in Perl or Python. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: