Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HMvXmjz=6r7Yf0yxHX-mzy60DPqoVB8K1b7COEBJKiZLg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 18:09, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Having the same memory mapping between threads makes allows the > hardware to share the TLB (on x86 via process context identifiers), which > isn't realistically possible with different processes. As a matter of historical interest Solaris actually did implement this across different processes. It was called by the somewhat unfortunate name "Intimate Shared Memory". I don't think Linux ever implemented anything like it but I'm not sure. I think this was not so much about cache hit rate but about just sheer wasted memory in page mappings. So I guess hugepages more or less target the same issues. But I find it interesting that they were already running into issues like this 20 years ago -- presumably those issues have only grown. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: