Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HMnX=KV+wnuh1Js=LG05ae-jBG5q5DKvXOSWf9MkVi0YQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: > I bet if you kept a judicious number of > clog pages in each local process with some smart invalidation you > could cover enough cases that scribbling the bits down would become > unnecessary. I don't understand how any cache can completely remove the need for hint bits. Without hint bits the xids in the tuples will be "in-doubt" forever. No matter how large your cache you'll always come across tuples that are arbitrarily old and are from an unbounded size set of xids. We could replace the xids with a frozen xid sooner but that just amounts to nearly the same thing as the hint bits only with page locking and wal records. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: