Re: Re: We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM-w4HM2WUO6Goz-F2FjiwWCCgqLOY8pbASJQBGRuRPLzNUBzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org
until we have a PPA
|
Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > 3) Configure apt's package pinning to prefer the PGDG packages over > the standard ones in /etc/apt/preferences.d/pgdg.pref > > Package: * > Pin: release o=apt.postgresql.org > Pin-Priority: 500 Why is this necessary? Is there a realistic chance Debian/Ubuntu will suddenly leap-frog us and have more recent versions? Maybe our packages should have a different name and be installable alongside the stock packages? > They aren't even remotely on parity with each other! Can you articulate why you think they aren't? Aside from the step above (which Josh actually points out you need to do on Yum as well) they seem pretty much equivalent. One extra command to add gpg keys doesn't seem like a watershed difference. -- greg
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: