Re: BUG #14397: Updatable VIEW doesn't work with ON CONFLICT from PgPreparedStatement
От | Grygoriy Gonchar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #14397: Updatable VIEW doesn't work with ON CONFLICT from PgPreparedStatement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALyjiZ2djLyvQx0pbDS9T6gR+u_3HEoQpNBOc5ntOPuQDYQWnA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #14397: Updatable VIEW doesn't work with ON CONFLICT from PgPreparedStatement ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi David and Peter, Yes, I did this cross posting to =E2=80=8Bhttp://stackoverflow.com/ questions/40260920/updatable-view-doesnt-work-with-on- conflict-in-postgres-9-5=E2=80=8B So it's not a bug but a limitation which = is quite logical but is not reflected in documentation. According to Postgres bug reporting guideline <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/bug-reporting.html> "If it is not clear from the documentation whether you can do something or not, please report that too; it is a bug in the documentation" should I create a separate bug to improve documentation or can we use this one? Thanks, Grygoriy On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 6:09 PM, David G. Johnston < david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:24 AM, <grygoriy.gonchar@kreditech.com> wrote: > >> The following bug has been logged on the website: >> >> Bug reference: 14397 >> Logged by: Grygoriy Gonchar >> Email address: grygoriy.gonchar@kreditech.com >> PostgreSQL version: 9.5.4 >> Operating system: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.2 >> Description: >> >> =E2=80=8B[...]=E2=80=8B >> >> >> An exception or error caused a run to abort: ERROR: ON CONFLICT is not >> supported on table "test" used as a catalog table >> > > =E2=80=8BAny chance you cross-posted this to Stack Overflow? A Google se= arch on > "used as a catalog table" turns up a post from 5 days ago that is awfully > similar. > > =E2=80=8Bhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/40260920/updatable-view- > doesnt-work-with-on-conflict-in-postgres-9-5=E2=80=8B > > =E2=80=8BThe conclusion there is that we seem to have a RLS interaction f= ailure. > I suspect this isn't a code bug but a known, if under-documented, > limitation though others more versed with these two features need to chim= e > in. > > David J. >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: