Re: Performance Issue after upgrade from 9 to 11
| От | Perumal Raj |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance Issue after upgrade from 9 to 11 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALvqh4o-eyy4tO-Ed=qaxw_Vo6o6xESNRt-dEKW57JMdUMnpMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance Issue after upgrade from 9 to 11 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance Issue after upgrade from 9 to 11
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom /Adrian,
Issue is not specific to a table or particular Query. Also there is no change in DB parameter after upgrade.
That the only way i can make it most of the the query to run as like before upgrade.
Note:
Some web reference says , Engine will take some time to adjust until it runs autovacuum .
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:22 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Perumal Raj <perucinci@gmail.com> writes:
> We have recently upgraded postgres from 9.2 to 11.6 and started seeing
> performance issue immediately and able to fix the performance issue after
> disabling parameter: enable_seqscan.
> Question :
> Should i keep the above parameter always disabled ? If not why the behavior
> changed in Higher version ?
This is unanswerable with the amount of information you've given.
Yes, turning off enable_seqscan is a bad idea in general, but why
you got a worse plan without that requires details.
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: