Re: block-level incremental backup
От | Ibrar Ahmed |
---|---|
Тема | Re: block-level incremental backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALtqXTeO_qVmZFdZ4sCMDeCED4289pj7tdfKhHWBVqkZhAGW4Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: block-level incremental backup (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: block-level incremental backup
Re: block-level incremental backup |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:00 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 3:41 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are we using any tar library in pg_basebackup.c? We already have the capability
> in pg_basebackup to do that.
I think pg_basebackup is using homebrew code to generate tar files,
but I'm reluctant to do that for reading tar files. For generating a
file, you can always emit the newest and "best" tar format, but for
reading a file, you probably want to be prepared for older or cruftier
variants. Maybe not -- I'm not super-familiar with the tar on-disk
format. But I think there must be a reason why tar libraries exist,
and I don't want to write a new one.
+1 using the library to tar. But I think reason not using tar library is TAR is
one of the most simple file format. What is the best/newest format of TAR?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Ibrar Ahmed
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: