Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1
От | Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALrs2KP4ktGNGwzRw72uSmG5iOFH3GwYVfnJhmBKX4dGN_oB+Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1 (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1
Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1 |
Список | pgsql-general |
The above are exactly the same, so if they are indeed from the different versions I do not see an issue. The question to ask here is whether the above are actually from the different Postgres instances?
Now i execute the same in pgsql 9.4.5 and all is fine!!!
The EXPLAINs are:
- pgsql 9.5.1:
Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.03..492944.81 rows=276095 width=4)
-> Seq Scan on _gc_tb a (cost=0.00..3321.30 rows=120130 width=66)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on _gc_cat b (cost=0.03..4.06 rows=2 width=70)
Recheck Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama))
-> Bitmap Index Scan on _gc_cat_arama_gin
(cost=0.00..0.03 rows=2 width=0)
Index Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND
(a.arama <@ arama))
- pgsql 9.4.5:
Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.03..492944.81 rows=276095 width=4)
-> Seq Scan on _gc_tb a (cost=0.00..3321.30 rows=120130 width=66)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on _gc_cat b (cost=0.03..4.06 rows=2 width=70)
Recheck Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama))
-> Bitmap Index Scan on _gc_cat_arama_gin
(cost=0.00..0.03 rows=2 width=0)
Index Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND
(a.arama <@ arama))
yes these are differents
So is each Postgres instance running in a separate container and if so are they set up the same?
Yes, is the same configuration!!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: