Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACXh4ur3gk1O-yT+R4sOJtKP6KSYjMYm6d4R-AtVTMhikw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:39 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the patch. Few trivial things: Thanks for reviewing. > ---------- > 1) > system-views.sgml: > > a) "Note that the slots" --> "Note that the slots on the standbys," > --it is good to mention "standbys" as synced could be true on primary > as well (promoted standby) Done. > b) If you plan to add more info which Bertrand suggested, then it will > be better to make a <note> section instead of using "Note" I added the note that Bertrand specified upthread. But, I couldn't find an instance of adding <note> ... </note> within a table. Hence with "Note that ...." statments just like any other notes in the system-views.sgml. pg_replication_slot in system-vews.sgml renders as table, so having <note> ... </note> may not be a great idea. > 2) > commit msg: > > "The impact of this > on a promoted standby inactive_since is always NULL for all > synced slots even after server restart. > " > Sentence looks broken. > --------- Reworded. > Apart from the above trivial things, v26-001 looks good to me. Please check the attached v27 patch which also has Bertrand's comment on deduplicating the TAP function. I've now moved it to Cluster.pm. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: