Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACXSQJXDjyPui0nmOH+fHNKzEVi3WJ+H34k_rjyQMVgovQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 5:26 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:47 AM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:32 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have completed reviewing 0001, I don't have more comments, just one > > > question. Soon I will review the remaining patches. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > + /* If parallel inserts are to be allowed, set a few extra information. */ > > > + if (myState->is_parallel) > > > + { > > > + myState->object_id = intoRelationAddr.objectId; > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * We don't need to skip contacting FSM while inserting tuples for > > > + * parallel mode, while extending the relations, workers instead of > > > + * blocking on a page while another worker is inserting, can check the > > > + * FSM for another page that can accommodate the tuples. This results > > > + * in major benefit for parallel inserts. > > > + */ > > > + myState->ti_options = 0; > > > > > > Is there any performance data for this or just theoretical analysis? > > > > I have seen that we don't get much performance with the skip fsm > > option, though I don't have the data to back it up. I'm planning to > > run performance tests after the patches 0001, 0002 and 0003 get > > reviewed. I will capture the data at that time. Hope that's fine. > > > > When you run the performance tests, you can try to capture and publish > relation size & the number of pages that are getting created for base > table and the CTAS table, you can use something like SELECT relpages > FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'tablename & SELECT > pg_total_relation_size('tablename'). Just to make sure that there is > no significant difference between the base table and CTAS table. I can do that, I'm sure the number of pages will be equal or little more, since I observed this for parallel copy. With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: