Re: Query on postgres_fdw extension
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query on postgres_fdw extension |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACXJOvjg1zhpB7RSC3jydFxEJumvDbfrG4fBHZuZFQKxNw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Query on postgres_fdw extension (Swathi P <swathi.bluepearl@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Query on postgres_fdw extension
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:31 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 6:08 PM Swathi P <swathi.bluepearl@gmail.com> wrote: > > In our sharding solution, we have multiple coodinator nodes. If we declare the table column as serial data type, we mightend up having duplicate values for id column in the table_a in host_b (data node) as cconnections come from multiplecoordinatoor nodes and might end up in duplicate key violations. > > > > Hence we decided to have the coordinator nodes as stateless and hence declared the column with no serial/sequence. Letme know if this makes sense. > > It seems reasonable to me to make coodinator nodes stateless, but may > I ask the reason you use multiple coordinator nodes? Perhaps, as a redundant node to avoid single point of failures? It's just a guess as I'm not the right one to answer that question though. With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: