Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACXHj9DibMhV9A8V1xc+dT2c6OL0_QDFOpTCAW2mXSs1nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 7:12 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > I am afraid that the using the FSM seems not get a stable performance gain(at least on my machine), > I will take a deep look into this to figure out the difference. A naive idea it that the benefit that bulk extension > bring is not much greater than the cost in FSM. > Do you have some ideas on it ? I think, if we try what Amit and I said in [1], we should get some insights on whether the bulk relation extension is taking more time or the FSM lookup. I plan to share the testing patch adding the timings and the counters so that you can also test from your end. I hope that's fine with you. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACXskhY58%3DFh8TioKLL1DXYkKdyEyWFYykf-6aLJgJ2qmQ%40mail.gmail.com With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: