Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACXH92ufFnsY+LieOEhaujWj9esNJ=cAbDGtrDzGwT5C4A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available (Cary Huang <cary.huang@highgo.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 1:31 AM Cary Huang <cary.huang@highgo.ca> wrote: > > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: > make installcheck-world: tested, passed > Implements feature: tested, passed > Spec compliant: not tested > Documentation: not tested > > Hello > > I tested this patch in a setup where the standby is in the middle of replicating and REDOing primary's WAL files duringa very large data insertion. During this time, I keep killing the walreceiver process to cause a stream failure andforce standby to read from archive. The system will restore from archive for "wal_retrieve_retry_interval" seconds beforeit attempts to steam again. Without this patch, once the streaming is interrupted, it keeps reading from archive untilstandby reaches the same consistent state of primary and then it will switch back to streaming again. So it seems thatthe patch does the job as described and does bring some benefit during a very large REDO job where it will try to re-streamafter restoring some WALs from archive to speed up this "catch up" process. But if the recovery job is not a largeone, PG is already switching back to streaming once it hits consistent state. Thanks a lot Cary for testing the patch. > Here's a v1 patch that I've come up with. I'm right now using the > existing GUC wal_retrieve_retry_interval to switch to stream mode from > archive mode as opposed to switching only after the failure to get WAL > from archive mode. If okay with the approach, I can add tests, change > the docs and add a new GUC to control this behaviour. I'm open to > thoughts and ideas here. It will be great if I can hear some thoughts on the above points (as posted upthread). Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: