Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACWk5a-LfBPziAjjFA--syoUSD_4jY6dZyhU8g8XuD-i7g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:40 PM Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > v13-0001 looks good to me. The only Nit (that I've mentioned up-thread) is that > in the pg_replication_slots view, the invalidation_reason is "far away" from the > conflicting field. I understand that one could query the fields individually but > when describing the view or reading the doc, it seems more appropriate to see > them closer. Also as "failover" and "synced" are also new in version 17, there > is no risk to break order by "17,18" kind of queries (which are the failover > and sync positions). Hm, yeah, I can change that in the next version of the patches. Thanks. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: