Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACWD77GG3UcCT=YT0TYGwSD6kfNBmetsQqD=T0TxJdtpbg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0 (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 6:25 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > The patch could not be applied cleanly because of recent commit d854720df6. > Could you rebase the patch? Thanks. Done. > - /* these must have a non-negative numeric value */ > + /* these must have a positive numeric value */ > > Isn't it better to replace this with "these must have a floating point value > greater than or equal to zero"? Changed. > - errmsg("%s requires a non-negative numeric value", > + errmsg("\"%s\" must be a numeric value greater than or equal to zero", > > "numeric" should be "floating point"? Changed. > + <quote>foo must be a numeric value greater than zero</quote> or > + <quote>foo must be a numeric value greater than or equal to zero</quote> > + if option <quote>foo</quote> expects a numeric value > > Maybe this description about numeric value is redundant > because there is already the description about integer value? Removed. > - /* Number of workers should be non-negative. */ > > Isn't it better to replace this with "Number of workers should be greater than zero" > rather than removing the comment? Changed. PSA v6 patch. Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: