Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACW+bVF8oP1xyoPFx3Fp8Rk=y533D6Nk24E+dLoKU5egWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cleanup - Removal of unused function parameter from CopyReadBinaryAttribute (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > I don't see any problem in removing this extra parameter. > > > > > > However another thought, can it be used to report a bit meaningful > > > error for field size < 0 check? > > > > column_no was used for that purpose in the past, but commit 0e319c7ad7 > > changed that. If we want to use column_no in the log message again, > > it's better to check why commit 0e319c7ad7 got rid of column_no from > > the message. > > I noticed that displaying of column information is present and it is > done in a different way. Basically cstate->cur_attname is set with the > column name before calling CopyReadBinaryAttribute function. If there > is any error in CopyReadBinaryAttribute function, > CopyFromErrorCallback will be called. CopyFromErrorCallback function > takes care of displaying the column name by using cstate->cur_attname. > I tried simulating this and it displays the column name neatly in the > error message.: > postgres=# copy t1 from '/home/db/copydata/t1_copy.bin' with (format 'binary'); > ERROR: invalid field size > CONTEXT: COPY t1, line 1, column c1 > I feel we can safely remove the parameter as in the patch. > thanks for this information. +1 for this patch. With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: